Ames Coalition for Effective Schools

January 16, 2012

Revisiting “Target” Capacity – part 1

Filed under: Finance / Money,Observations / Musings,School Board — amesces @ 8:54 am

A few posts back, we explored the concept of a “target” capacity. That is, the amount of capacity the proposed long-range facilities plan should account for. Per the value in Struxture’s report, we determined the “target” capacity would be 2,200 by 2030.

To recall, this is arrived at by using the projected enrollment of 2,000 by the year 2030 and adding 10%, or 200. 2,000 + 200 = 2,200

Estimating Growth

From the 2011-2012 school year, the estimate is that in 19 years (2030-2031) the elementary student population will reach 2,000. Using the Nov 14 building-grade counts showing 1,883 elementary students this year ( ACSD School Board Mtg – 11-14-11 – Elementary Building-Grade Counts 2011-2012 ), that’s approximately 120 students in the next 20 years – or about 6 elementary students a year.

To be a bit more precise (which is misleading since enrollment fluctuates greatly),

  • Change in Elementary Students = 117 (2,000 – 1,883)
  • Change in Time = 19 years (2011-2012 to 2030-2031)
  • Average = 6.2 Elementary Students per year

The table below uses the above “rate” of growth in elementary students (always rounding to a whole student), adds a 10% cushion, and presents the rolling “target” capacity for 2011-2012 through 2030-2031.

School Year Elementary Students (est) Cushion (%) “Target” Capacity
2011-2012 1,883 188 2,071
2012-2013 1,889 189 2,078
2013-2014 1,895 190 2,085
2014-2015 1,901 190 2,092
2015-2016 1,908 191 2,098
2016-2017 1,914 191 2,105
2017-2018 1,920 192 2,112
2018-2019 1,926 193 2,119
2019-2020 1,932 193 2,125
2020-2021 1,938 194 2,132
2021-2022 1,945 194 2,139
2022-2023 1,951 195 2,146
2023-2024 1,957 196 2,153
2024-2025 1,963 196 2,159
2025-2026 1,969 197 2,166
2026-2027 1,975 198 2,173
2027-2028 1,982 198 2,180
2028-2029 1,988 199 2,186
2029-2030 1,994 199 2,193
2030-2031 2,000 200 2,200

As you can see, the simplistic model takes us from the 1,883 reported in Nov (see link above) to the projected 2,200 “target” capacity for 2030.

So how does this match up with the capacity being created in the proposed facilities plan?

Dr. Dave

Advertisement

Leave a Comment »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Theme: Rubric. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.